<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>techscorn &#187; technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techscorn.com/category/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techscorn.com</link>
	<description>sometimes tech. sometimes scorn. sometimes both.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:33:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATED: Getting the &#8220;Model Identifier&#8221; for a Mac via ARD</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2011/02/getting-the-model-identifier-for-a-mac-via-ard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2011/02/getting-the-model-identifier-for-a-mac-via-ard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the recent release of a new firmware update for the latest version of the Mac Pros, I was wondering if there was an easy way to query a bunch of systems for their Model Identifier. This is a unique name for a particular model of Mac, that can be found in the Apple System [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/ard1.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-136" title="ARD &gt; Send UNIX Command" src="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/ard1-300x259.png" alt="ARD &gt; Send UNIX Command" width="300" height="259" /></a>With the recent release of a new <a title="About Mac Pro EFI Firmware Update 1.4" href="http://support.apple.com/kb/DL989" target="_blank">firmware update</a> for the latest version of the <a title="Mac Pros @ Amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fs%3Fie%3DUTF8%26redirect%3Dtrue%26ref_%3Dsr%255Fnr%255Fp%255F4%255F0%26keywords%3Dmac%2520pro%26bbn%3D172282%26qid%3D1264015812%26rnid%3D15784691%26rh%3Dn%253A172282%252Ck%253Amac%2520pro%252Cp%255F4%253AApple&amp;tag=wanderorgbooks&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957" target="_blank">Mac Pros</a>, I was wondering if there was an easy way to query a bunch of systems for their Model Identifier. This is a unique name for a particular model of Mac, that can be found in the Apple System Profiler app. Some examples are &#8220;MacPro3,1&#8243;, &#8220;PowerMac10,2&#8243; &amp; &#8220;Xserve3,1&#8243;. Minor revs in a particular model will typically be denoted by incrementing the number after the comma, while major updates are before. <a title="ARD @ Amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fs%3Fie%3DUTF8%26tag%3Dmozilla-20%26index%3Dblended%26link_code%3Dqs%26field-keywords%3Dapple%2520remote%2520desktop%26sourceid%3DMozilla-search&amp;tag=wanderorgbooks&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957" target="_blank">Apple Remote Desktop</a> can give you the &#8220;Machine Model&#8221; (Report&gt;System Overview&#8230;&gt;Machine Model), but this is a dumbed down name of the system that isn&#8217;t specific enough for this purpose.<span id="more-134"></span></p>
<p>Since the Model Identifier can be viewed in the System Profiler app, it seemed there had to be an easy way to grab this from the terminal. After a quick Google search, I found the lead I needed at <a title="Wikipedia: System Profiler (Apple)" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_Profiler_%28Apple%29" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a>. As it turns out, there&#8217;s a command line version of System Profiler called &#8220;<code>system_profiler</code>&#8221; (of course). After looking over the <a title="Mac OS X Manual Page For system_profiler(8)" href="http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/DOCUMENTATION/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/man8/system_profiler.8.html" target="_blank">man page</a>, I constructed the following command, which can easily be issued via <a title="ARD @ Amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Fs%3Fie%3DUTF8%26tag%3Dmozilla-20%26index%3Dblended%26link_code%3Dqs%26field-keywords%3Dapple%2520remote%2520desktop%26sourceid%3DMozilla-search&amp;tag=wanderorgbooks&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957" target="_blank">ARD</a> to a batch of systems.</p>
<p><code>system_profiler -detailLevel mini | grep "Model Identifier:"</code></p>
<p>This will return just the single line from the System Profile&#8230;</p>
<p><code>Model Identifier: MacPro3,1</code></p>
<p>Using that same command, you can use ARD&#8217;s &#8220;Send a UNIX Command&#8230;&#8221; to pass that command to a bunch of systems at once, and you&#8217;ll end up with a result screen showing the Model Identifier for all queried systems. Easy peasy! The <code>system_profile</code> command seems to work as far back as 10.4.11 (8S2167), but failed on 10.4.11 (8S165), so your actual mileage may vary.</p>
<p>Big props go out to Google for knowing everything and getting me on the right path.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> Reader Chad had and even better method&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Using the command: <code>system_profiler SPHardwareDataType | grep "Model Identifier:"</code> gets you there much faster. It’s not having to go through as much data.</p>
<p>Similarly, <code>system_profiler SPHardwareDataType | grep "Serial Number (system):"</code> is handy too if you need to check the exact computers.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2011/02/getting-the-model-identifier-for-a-mac-via-ard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Street View Sub-Contractor?</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/06/streetview-sub-contractor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/06/streetview-sub-contractor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 06:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street view]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/2007/06/16/streetview-sub-contractor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Street View Sub-Contractor?, originally uploaded by chrisr. Spotted this vehicle today on the way to Molly Stones. I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s for creating the pano photos for Google&#8217;s Street View, but perhaps someone else is deploying something similar. Earthmine.com has nothing beyond login and email links. The domain is registered to some dude in San Francisco [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css"> .flickr-photo { border: solid 2px #000000; } .flickr-yourcomment { } .flickr-frame { text-align: left; padding: 3px; } .flickr-caption { font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px; } </style>
<p class="flickr-frame"> 	<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisr/559061406/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1170/559061406_cf53ddb632.jpg" class="flickr-photo" /></a></p>
<p><span class="flickr-caption"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisr/559061406/">Street View Sub-Contractor?</a>, originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/chrisr/">chrisr</a>.</span></p>
<p class="flickr-yourcomment"> 	Spotted this vehicle today <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2fa74c" title="-&gt; google streetview" target="_blank">on the way</a> to <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2yr875" title="-&gt; google maps" target="_blank">Molly Stones</a>. I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s for creating the pano photos for Google&#8217;s <a href="http://maps.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=68476#street_views" title="steet view info" target="_blank">Street View</a>, but perhaps someone else is deploying something similar. <a href="http://earthmine.com" title="earthmine.com" target="_blank">Earthmine.com</a> has nothing beyond login and email links. The domain is registered to some dude in San Francisco at a company called SurfaceWise. <shrug><br />
</shrug></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/06/streetview-sub-contractor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Armchair iPhone Quarterbacks &amp; The Clueless</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/01/armchair-iphone-quarterbacks-the-clueless/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/01/armchair-iphone-quarterbacks-the-clueless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[scorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/20070111armchair-iphone-quarterbacks-the-clueless/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ZOMG! The amount of commentary and pseudo punditry about the iPhone is frankly&#8230;breathtaking. Or do I mean nauseating? Either way, I wanted to address one specific issue that&#8217;s running rampant around the web currently. You see&#8230;Steve Jobs proclaimed to his flock, that the OS behind the iPhone, was in fact none other than OS X. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/iphone.jpg" title="iPhone" id="image22" alt="iPhone" align="right" height="223" width="126" />ZOMG! The amount of commentary and pseudo punditry about the iPhone is frankly&#8230;breathtaking. Or do I mean nauseating? Either way, I wanted to address one specific issue that&#8217;s running rampant around the web currently. You see&#8230;Steve Jobs proclaimed to his flock, that the OS behind the iPhone, was in fact none other than OS X. I suppose Steve could have gone on to explain this aspect a bit better, but he had features to cover people!!</p>
<p>Now fanboys and haters alike ran with this golden nugget and started frothing at the mouth with the thought of running Photoshop CS3 on their sexy little iPhone. To say nothing of Quark, World of Warcraft, Final Cut Pro, etc. Apparently they have little knowledge of operating systems. To say it as simply as possible, OSes, for the most part, are very modular.<span id="more-21"></span> OS X, being  a hybrid of *nix and Apple Goodness is no different. So with the launch of the iPhone, it seems Apple has been hard at work, turning our trusty desktop OS X, into a finely tuned and optimized <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embedded_system" target="_blank" title="wiki - embedded system">embedded system</a>. Now if you&#8217;ve been around Apple for any decent amount of time, you&#8217;d know that it&#8217;s been rumored for ages that OS X would be taken in this direction. In fact, I think it was right after the first iPod came out (although that rumor appears to be lost in the motes of the internet at this particular moment).</p>
<p>So here we have a finely tuned piece of hardware, with a tailor-made OS X soul giving it life. You can&#8217;t just run any desktop app on there that you want, so get over it. The next point the fanboys and haters are whining about, is that the initial word is that the iPhone is going to be locked down. Meaning you won&#8217;t be able to install your own apps, widgets etc. The computer bolt-on hotrodding crowd is flipping out to say the least. If they can&#8217;t dig their hands into the guts of the device (which I&#8217;m sure the true cutting edge geeks will do anyway), their big hair &#8211; well &#8211; just goes flat.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a method to Apple&#8217;s madness though, I assure you. It&#8217;s called controlling the environment, and it&#8217;s the exact reason they put an end to the whole ill-fated Mac clone market. Apple is all about trying to present the user, with the most consistent, stable and enjoyable experience ever. Oh&#8230;and also to get that piece of yumminess to market as soon as possible. Gotta keep those shareholders happy too. They can do this so precisely because they control both the hardware and the OS. Now the iPhone is no different. Particularly for a first gen, ground breaking product, 5 months before it ships. Of course they&#8217;re going to be tight right now. Big surprise!</p>
<p>Thankfully for everyone, evolution permeates everything we do (we&#8217;re only human), so I fully expect this to change. It will start with cool new widgets from Apple, then a widget developer kit, then the sky is the limit. Then there&#8217;s that iPod connector that 3rd party vendors have been exploiting so successful. To say nothing of what the real hacker geeks manage to do out there completely unaided rogue-style. Hats off to them.</p>
<p>So in the meantime, all you low ranking geek pundits with blogs and lots of spare time should just settle down, have a drink or two, admit that you love that cute little iPhone over there, even with its faults. You know you want one. Don&#8217;t cha?</p>
<p>P.S. I also wouldn&#8217;t be too surprised if some of those specs get tweaked before it ships as well. 16GB? UMTS (Cingular is woefully behind on their end)? iChat features? There&#8217;s a lot of room to grow, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> Job&#8217;s <a href="http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/news/comments/apples-jobs-more-iphone-apps-coming-before-launch/9320" title="iLounge link">weighs in</a> on the topic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/01/armchair-iphone-quarterbacks-the-clueless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USB 2.0 &#8211; Don&#039;t believe the hype!</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2006/11/usb-20-dont-believe-the-hype/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2006/11/usb-20-dont-believe-the-hype/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 21:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/20061109usb-20-dont-believe-the-hype/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since USB 2.0 hit the market, it&#8217;s been touted as the next best thing to sliced bread. Or at least better then Firewire 400 (aka 1394a). As you may know, FW400 is 400 Mb/s and USB 2.0 is rated at 480 Mb/s, so you&#8217;d think USB 2.0 would be faster. But it&#8217;s not. In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/usb-96x150.png" alt="usb" id="image19" title="usb" align="right" />Ever since USB 2.0 hit the market, it&#8217;s been touted as the next best thing to sliced bread. Or at least better then Firewire 400 (aka 1394a). As you may know, FW400 is 400 Mb/s and USB 2.0 is rated at 480 Mb/s, so you&#8217;d think USB 2.0 would be faster. But it&#8217;s not. In all my experience with file transfers, it always comes up short, and Firewire is by far faster and more stable. I don&#8217;t have any concrete reports in front of me backing this up &#8211; just experience and gut. Yet USB seems to be the belle of the ball for some reason. WTF??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2006/11/usb-20-dont-believe-the-hype/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

