<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>techscorn &#187; web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techscorn.com/category/web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techscorn.com</link>
	<description>sometimes tech. sometimes scorn. sometimes both.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:31:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Glass Houses, Yahoo and MS. Glass Houses.</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2010/02/glass-houses-yahoo-and-ms-glass-houses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2010/02/glass-houses-yahoo-and-ms-glass-houses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[scorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google announced their new Buzz product yesterday, and both Microsoft and Yahoo were quick with their responses. Microsoft was all, '...that's a dumb idea. Besides Hotmail has had linking with external sites forever.' And Yahoo was like, '...we had the original Buzz.' Here's my feeling on their positions. First, Microsoft. Hotmail? Really? Have you really [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/glass-houses.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-140" title="glass-houses" src="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/glass-houses.jpg" alt="BJGlassHouses" width="200" height="200" /></a>Google announced their new <a title="Google Buzz" href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2010/02/google-buzz-in-gmail.html" target="_blank">Buzz</a> product yesterday, and both Microsoft and Yahoo were quick with their <a title="HuffPost MS &amp; Yahoo Slam Google?" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/09/google-buzz-slammed-by-ya_n_455591.html" target="_blank">responses</a>. Microsoft was all, '...that's a dumb idea. Besides Hotmail has had linking with external sites forever.' And Yahoo was like, '...we had the original Buzz.' Here's my feeling on their positions.</p>
<p>First, Microsoft. Hotmail? Really? Have you really looked at Hotmail lately? It's horrible. In fact, last I heard, it could be a <a title="Lifehacker &gt; Email Prejudice" href="http://lifehacker.com/5445607/whats-your-email-address-prejudice" target="_blank">detriment</a> to getting a job. Sure lots of people probably still use Hotmail (not that I know personally of course), but your problem is, no one is excited about using Hotmail.</p>
<p>Second, Yahoo. <a title="Yahoo Buzz" href="http://buzz.yahoo.com/" target="_self">Buzz.yahoo.com</a>? Really? I don't know if you noticed or not, but Buzz.yahoo.com is a straight rip on <a title="Digg.com" href="http://digg.com" target="_blank">Digg</a>. Try to innovate next time. Or better yet, take those resources and pour them into <a title="Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=glass+house&amp;w=all" target="_blank">Flickr</a>. It's about the only viable business you have left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2010/02/glass-houses-yahoo-and-ms-glass-houses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A (cosmetic) fix for those Feedburner tracking URLs</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2010/01/a-cosmetic-fix-for-those-feedburner-tracking-urls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2010/01/a-cosmetic-fix-for-those-feedburner-tracking-urls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[scorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm a huge Google Reader nerd, and a few months ago, Feedburner (an RSS feed provider) started generating long URLs that are used to track outbound clicks in their feeds. Here's an example: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/01/solar-eclipse-images-show-dazzling-corona-detail/?utm_source=feedburner&#38;utm_medium=feed&#38;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired%2Findex+%28Wired%3A+Index+3+%28Top+Stories+2%29%29&#38;utm_content=Google+Reader Everything after that question mark (in red) isn't necessary to the user, and is only needed for the feed owner to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm a huge <a title="Chris Rosa's Shared Google Reader Page" href="http://www.google.com/reader/shared/chrisrosa" target="_blank">Google Reader</a> nerd, and a few months ago, <a title="Feedburner" href="http://feedburner.google.com/">Feedburner</a> (an RSS feed provider) started generating long URLs that are used to track outbound clicks in their feeds. Here's an example:</p>
<blockquote><p>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/01/solar-eclipse-images-show-dazzling-corona-detail/<span style="color: #800000;">?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired%2Findex+%28Wired%3A+Index+3+%28Top+Stories+2%29%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader</span></p></blockquote>
<p>Everything after that question mark (in red) isn't necessary to the user, and is only needed for the feed owner to track clicks from their feed. This isn't a big deal by any means, but it is kinda annoying to me. I parse my river of RSS feeds and occasionally pass along interesting links to my twitter feed, and I prefer to send the cleanest URL possible. Sure it's shortened automatically with <a title="bit.ly site" href="http://bit.ly/" target="_blank">bit.ly</a>, but it still bugs me, so I've been looking for a solution to clean up the URL.</p>
<p>I'm not a big JS coder, but I figured there had to be a Greasemonkey script that would do the trick, and after doing a bit of searching, I found the solution over at <a title="userscripts.org" href="http://userscripts.org/" target="_blank">userscripts.org</a>. Enter <a title="userscripts.org &gt; FeedBurnerTrackingQueryStripper" href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/63631" target="_blank">FeedBurnerTrackingQueryStripper</a>. This little <a title="Firefox Addons &gt; Greasemonkey" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/748" target="_blank">Greasemonkey</a> script does the trick perfectly. It's strips the tracking information from the URL after the page loads. So the feed owner is happy, and the user is left with a simpler URL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2010/01/a-cosmetic-fix-for-those-feedburner-tracking-urls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacWorld Conference website&#8230;Ouch.</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2008/01/macworld-conference-websiteouch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2008/01/macworld-conference-websiteouch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[scorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macworldexpo mac idg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/2008/01/07/macworld-conference-websiteouch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With my best sarcasm voice: 'IDG has really outdone themselves again with their stellar MacWorld Expo website this year.' To say nothing of the issues with the code (the footer was in the middle of all the pages a week or so ago), but the site itself is so hard to use. I'm attending the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin: 3px;" src="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/picture-1.png" alt="MacWorld IT PDF" width="328" height="263" align="right" />With my best sarcasm voice: '<a title="IDG World Expo" href="http://www.idgworldexpo.com/live/wec/" target="_blank">IDG</a> has really outdone themselves again with their stellar <a title="MacWorld Expo" href="http://macworldexpo.com/" target="_blank">MacWorld Expo</a> website this year.' To say nothing of the issues with the code (the footer was in the middle of all the pages a week or so ago), but the site itself is so hard to use. I'm attending the <a title="MacIT Conference" href="http://macworldexpo.com/conference_program/details/13246" target="_blank">MacIT Conference</a> again this year, and I'd love to have a PDF to download so I can read through the descriptions and figure out my schedule. Instead the only way to get this info is to click through each link on the site, either back and forth or via a bunch of browser tabs. You'd think downloading the "<a title="MacIT Conference PDF" href="http://macworldexpo.com/files/MWSF08_MacITV2.pdf" target="_blank">MacIT Conference-@-a-Glance</a>" PDF would be useful, but what you get is a PDF print out of a schedule produced in Excel. No information about conferences at all aside from their start and stop times. It's painfully obvious, the whole thing was put together with a shoestring budget, but why? Are Expos going the way of the dinosaur, or is it just bad management? Or both? It's hard to say, but complicating such a simple task isn't helping anyone. This site could stand a healthy dose of <a title="WWDC 2007" href="http://developer.apple.com/wwdc/sessions/" target="_blank">Web 2.0</a>, stat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2008/01/macworld-conference-websiteouch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TechScorn</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/12/techscorn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/12/techscorn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[admin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/2007/12/13/techscorn/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TechScorn is now iPhone-ready thanks to the handy iWPhone WordPress Plugin and Theme! The guys over at Content Robot frickin' rock. Thanks guys!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TechScorn is now iPhone-ready thanks to the handy <a href="http://iwphone.contentrobot.com/2007/07/04/iwphone-wordpress-plugin-and-theme" title="iWPhone" target="_blank">iWPhone WordPress Plugin and Theme</a>! The guys over at <a href="http://" title="http://www.contentrobot.com/" target="_blank">Content Robot</a> frickin' rock. Thanks guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/12/techscorn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upcoming RSS Choking on Spam</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/12/upcoming-rss-choking-on-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/12/upcoming-rss-choking-on-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 06:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[scorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[captcha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upcoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/2007/12/04/upcoming-rss-choking-on-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most Upcoming users may not even notice the war that's raging behind the scenes at this very minute. However, being the RSS junkie that I am, it's painfully obvious. You see, on the web-side, it looks like Upcoming is doing a good job of keeping the site spam free. Unfortunately it appears their RSS pipe, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most <a href="http://upcoming.yahoo.com/" title="Upcoming.yahoo.com" target="_blank">Upcoming</a> users may not even notice the war that's raging behind the scenes at this very minute. However, being the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rss" title="wikipedia - rss" target="_blank">RSS</a> junkie that I am, it's painfully obvious. You see, on the web-side, it looks like Upcoming is doing a good job of keeping the site spam free. Unfortunately it appears their RSS pipe, which I use daily to find new events in San Francisco, is passing along each and every spam event that's entered.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/greader-upcoming_spam.png" alt="Upcoming Spam" height="222" width="382" /></p>
<p><span id="more-31"></span> Previously you'd only see real spam once every month or so, with an occasional spammy (or was it just annoying?) event now and then. Today alone, there have been approximately 80 or so spam entries and the number is still climbing; and not just short items - but long ones that fill my Google Reader screen, and then some.</p>
<p>It's obvious someone has figured out an automated system to post spam events to Upcoming. Or should I say, a spammer just turned his attention toward Upcoming, and realized it was an easy mark?</p>
<p>Or so I thought at first. I've been flagging events as spam whenever I could, since this started, but it finally got annoying enough that I sent the powers that be a terse message about getting a handle of this and maybe "using <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captcha" title="wikipedia - captcha" target="_blank">captcha</a> or something." And what do you know...they do! You see, you don't need to bother w/ captcha when entering a new event, but you do need to when creating a new account. Here's a sample below:</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/upcoming-captcha.jpg" alt="Upcoming Captcha" /></p>
<p> It seems some crafty spammer has figured out how to automagically read this type of captcha? It was just a couple weeks ago that I saw an article asking "<a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001001.html" target="_blank">Has CAPTCHA Been Broken?</a>" It went on to talk about a Chinese hacker that had a complete pricelist of captchas that could be countered, but that Yahoo's was currently unbreakable. Well...it appears things have changed.</p>
<p>Or perhaps they're getting paid enough by their advertisers nowadays to hire an army full of people that know one English character from another. Either way, it's obvious that the current state of human verification just isn't good enough. Perhaps RSS spam filter services are just around the corner? Hrumpf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/12/upcoming-rss-choking-on-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WTFSURVEY??</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2006/10/wtfsurvey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2006/10/wtfsurvey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/20061025wtfsurvey/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently purchased an accessory for my prized Mac Book Pro directly from the vendor. About a week and a half later (today) I received an email from them asking me to fill out a lengthy survey. I'm old and jaded (in internet terms) so I immediately wondered, what do *I* get out of this? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently purchased an accessory for my prized <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s/102-7777808-9428162?ie=UTF8&amp;keywords=Mac%20Book%20Pro&amp;tag=wanderorgbooks&amp;Go.x=0&amp;index=blended&amp;Go=Go&amp;Go.y=0&amp;link%5Fcode=qs" target="_blank" title="Mac Book Pro Link">Mac Book Pro</a> directly from the vendor. About a week and a half later (today) I received an email from them asking me to fill out a lengthy survey. I'm old and jaded (in internet terms) so I immediately wondered, what do *I* get out of this? I mean, I'm spending my spare time to help them improve their business. The absolute least they could do is offer me a discount on a future purchase, if not a freebie of some sort. Or god forbid, cash! What gives? How many people actually take time out of their day to do this for a company? So keep this in mind if you're planning on soliciting feedback from your customers. You've got to offer something up for their time. You know why? It doesn't have to be much, but you have to show that you know that their time is valuable. Then maybe they'll take the time to help you out, rather than just deleting your solicitation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2006/10/wtfsurvey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
