<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>techscorn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techscorn.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techscorn.com</link>
	<description>Serving up scorn and/or technology.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Beware cheap bluetooth speakerphones.</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2008/07/31/beware-cheap-bluetooth-speakerphones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2008/07/31/beware-cheap-bluetooth-speakerphones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[scorn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bluetooth]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been in the market for a bluetooth speakerphone for the car for awhile now. So far, my experience with my previous Garmin Nüvi 650, and my current TomTom 720 has been less then stellar in the actual phone call department. In general, I can hear the caller fairly well, but they can&#8217;t hear me. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/222190.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-45" src="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/222190.jpg" alt="VR3" width="300" height="300" align="right" /></a>I&#8217;ve been in the market for a bluetooth speakerphone for the car for awhile now. So far, my experience with my previous <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&amp;keywords=garmin&amp;tag=wanderorgbooks&amp;Go.x=10&amp;index=blended&amp;Go=Go&amp;Go.y=9&amp;link_code=qs" target="_blank">Garmin</a> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&amp;keywords=garmin%20650&amp;tag=wanderorgbooks&amp;Go.x=0&amp;index=blended&amp;Go=Go&amp;Go.y=0&amp;link_code=qs" target="_blank">Nüvi 650</a>, and my current <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&amp;keywords=tomtom&amp;tag=wanderorgbooks&amp;Go.x=10&amp;index=blended&amp;Go=Go&amp;Go.y=9&amp;link_code=qs" target="_blank">TomTom</a> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&amp;keywords=tomtom%20720&amp;tag=wanderorgbooks&amp;Go.x=10&amp;index=blended&amp;Go=Go&amp;Go.y=9&amp;link_code=qs">720</a> has been less then stellar in the actual phone call department. In general, I can hear the caller fairly well, but they can&#8217;t hear me. Which seems to be due to the fact that the GPS is a good distance from my face and the ambient road noise certainly doesn&#8217;t help. Sure they both have microphone options, but who needs yet another cable routed around their car? So I thought a visor mounted bluetooth speakerphone would do the trick.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had my eye on the well rated <a title="BlueAnt Supertooth3" href="http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&amp;keywords=BA-SUPERTOOTH3&amp;tag=wanderorgbooks&amp;Go.x=12&amp;index=blended&amp;Go=Go&amp;Go.y=11&amp;link_code=qs" target="_blank">BlueAnt Supertooth3</a>, but haven&#8217;t gotten around to ordering one yet. Instead, on impulse, I picked up the super cheap Roadmaster VR3 at Costco this weekend. Somehow I got it in my head that it was a Motorola product, which made me feel better for some reason. As it turns out, cheap applies to more than just price with this product.</p>
<p>Pairing was simple enough, and making and receiving calls was a no brainer, but here are the deal-breaking issues for me:</p>
<ul>
<li>There&#8217;s a bright blue light that flashes repeatedly. I suppose it&#8217;s indicating that your phone has an active connection (in addition to the indicator on the LCD display), but with this thing mounted on your visor, it&#8217;s horribly distracting. Particularly at night time. I thought for sure there would be a way to disable this light, but that doesn&#8217;t seem to be the case.</li>
<li>Even with the thing probably 8 inches from my face, I couldn&#8217;t be heard by the caller.</li>
<li>The flip down, backlit LCD display is almost useless. Caller ID numbers that pop up are somewhat hard to decipher because they&#8217;re so closely kerned together, and there&#8217;s no logical spacing for the area code and prefix.</li>
<li>General build quality is weak. From the creaky construction to the sickly sounding audio feedback when pushing buttons; it&#8217;s embarassing to have hanging in your car.</li>
</ul>
<p>So there ya go. I&#8217;ll be returning this POS to Costco ASAP. Honestly the built-in speakerphone on my iPhone has been better than all other speakerphone devices I&#8217;ve tried in the car. So ultimately, I&#8217;ll probably stick with the iPhone and occasionally using the earbud headset for longer calls. I really can&#8217;t be bothered with one more device to charge anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2008/07/31/beware-cheap-bluetooth-speakerphones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogging from iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2008/07/21/blogging-from-iphonr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2008/07/21/blogging-from-iphonr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/2008/07/21/blogging-from-iphonr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wordpress released a native iPhone application today. Now if only typing on an iPhone didn&#8217;t kinda blow.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wordpress released a native <a title="iPhone Wordpress App" href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=285073074&amp;mt=8" target="_blank">iPhone application</a> today. Now if only typing on an iPhone didn&#8217;t kinda blow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2008/07/21/blogging-from-iphonr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leopard Screencaps w/o Shadow</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2008/02/20/leopard-screencaps-wo-shadow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2008/02/20/leopard-screencaps-wo-shadow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[applescript]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[leopard]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[screencapture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[terminal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/2008/02/20/leopard-screencaps-wo-shadow/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since upgrading to Leopard, I was surprised to find that screen captures of windows now include a drop shadow. If you&#8217;re not familiar with OS X&#8217;s built-in screencap utility, you can hit cmd-shift-3 to grab the full screen, cmd-shft-4 to get selection crosshairs, and if you use cmd-shift-4 then hit the spacebar, you&#8217;ll be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/man-screencap.png" title="man screencap"><img src="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/man-screencap.png" alt="man screencap" align="right" height="188" width="299" /></a>Ever since upgrading to Leopard, I was surprised to find that screen captures of windows now include a drop shadow. If you&#8217;re not familiar with OS X&#8217;s built-in screencap utility, you can hit cmd-shift-3 to grab the full screen, cmd-shft-4 to get selection crosshairs, and if you use cmd-shift-4 then hit the spacebar, you&#8217;ll be able to grab any screen elements (windows, menus, etc.). In Tiger, the latter method would grab just the window, and in Leopard, it grabs the window plus its drop shadow. I found this extremely annoying, because I often need to put together instruction sheets for users, and I found I was always having to crop-out the shadow.</p>
<p>Since Leopard was released, I would occasionally google to try to find a solution to this problem, but have never been able to find a fix. Until today, when I had an epiphany. OS X has a command line screen capture tool. &#8220;Perhaps I&#8217;ll find a clue there,&#8221; I thought. Sure enough - pay dirt. Look what I found in the man page&#8230;</p>
<p><code>-o      In window capture mode, do not capture the shadow of the window.</code><br />
<span id="more-37"></span><br />
That right there tells me that it&#8217;s an option, and that there&#8217;s at least a workaround.  So I coupled this with two other options, interactive mode, and clipboard (rather than save) and voila! It works!</p>
<p><code>screencapture -ioc</code></p>
<p>Using the command above, I was immediately presented with Leopard&#8217;s screen cap crosshairs, so I then hit the spacebar to switch to element selection mode, moused over the window I wanted to grab, then clicked. This then put the image in my clipboard, so I switched to Preview.app, and opened a new document, which automatically inserts the contents of the clipboard. Without the useless drop shadow.</p>
<p>This is definitely a workaround for now. I&#8217;m hoping there&#8217;s a preference file somewhere that can be modified to omit the drop shadow from screen caps by default. Until then, I just wrapped the command above in some AppleScript for ease of use:</p>
<p><code><font color="#0000ff">do shell script</font> &#8220;screencapture -ioc&#8221;</code></p>
<p>Saved as an AppleScript app works great because you can invoke it by name via Spotlight.</p>
<p>Have fun, and let me know if you figure out where this default preference resides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2008/02/20/leopard-screencaps-wo-shadow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacWorld Conference website&#8230;Ouch.</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2008/01/07/macworld-conference-websiteouch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2008/01/07/macworld-conference-websiteouch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[scorn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[macworldexpo mac idg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/2008/01/07/macworld-conference-websiteouch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With my best sarcasm voice: &#8216;IDG has really outdone themselves again with their stellar MacWorld Expo website this year.&#8217; To say nothing of the issues with the code (the footer was in the middle of all the pages a week or so ago), but the site itself is so hard to use. I&#8217;m attending the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/picture-1.png" alt="MacWorld IT PDF" align="right" height="263" width="328" />With my best sarcasm voice: &#8216;<a href="http://www.idgworldexpo.com/live/wec/" title="IDG World Expo" target="_blank">IDG</a> has really outdone themselves again with their stellar <a href="http://macworldexpo.com/" title="MacWorld Expo" target="_blank">MacWorld Expo</a> website this year.&#8217; To say nothing of the issues with the code (the footer was in the middle of all the pages a week or so ago), but the site itself is so hard to use. I&#8217;m attending the <a href="http://macworldexpo.com/conference_program/details/13246" title="MacIT Conference" target="_blank">MacIT Conference</a> again this year, and I&#8217;d love to have a PDF to download so I can read through the descriptions and figure out my schedule. Instead the only way to get this info is to click through each link on the site, either back and forth or via a bunch of browser tabs. You&#8217;d think downloading the &#8220;<a href="http://macworldexpo.com/files/MWSF08_MacITV2.pdf" title="MacIT Conference PDF" target="_blank">MacIT Conference-@-a-Glance</a>&#8221; PDF would be useful, but what you get is a PDF print out of a schedule produced in Excel. No information about conferences at all aside from their start and stop times. It&#8217;s painfully obvious, the whole thing was put together with a shoestring budget, but why? Are Expos going the way of the dinosaur, or is it just bad management? Or both? It&#8217;s hard to say, but complicating such a simple task isn&#8217;t helping anyone. This site could stand a healthy dose of <a href="http://developer.apple.com/wwdc/sessions/" title="WWDC 2007" target="_blank">Web 2.0</a>, stat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2008/01/07/macworld-conference-websiteouch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TechScorn </title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/12/13/techscorn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/12/13/techscorn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[admin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[plugin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[theme]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/2007/12/13/techscorn/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TechScorn is now iPhone-ready thanks to the handy iWPhone Wordpress Plugin and Theme! The guys over at Content Robot frickin&#8217; rock. Thanks guys!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TechScorn is now iPhone-ready thanks to the handy <a href="http://iwphone.contentrobot.com/2007/07/04/iwphone-wordpress-plugin-and-theme" title="iWPhone" target="_blank">iWPhone Wordpress Plugin and Theme</a>! The guys over at <a href="http://" title="http://www.contentrobot.com/" target="_blank">Content Robot</a> frickin&#8217; rock. Thanks guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/12/13/techscorn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upcoming RSS Choking on Spam</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/12/04/upcoming-rss-choking-on-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/12/04/upcoming-rss-choking-on-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 06:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[scorn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[captcha]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rss]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[upcoming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/2007/12/04/upcoming-rss-choking-on-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most Upcoming users may not even notice the war that&#8217;s raging behind the scenes at this very minute. However, being the RSS junkie that I am, it&#8217;s painfully obvious. You see, on the web-side, it looks like Upcoming is doing a good job of keeping the site spam free. Unfortunately it appears their RSS pipe, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most <a href="http://upcoming.yahoo.com/" title="Upcoming.yahoo.com" target="_blank">Upcoming</a> users may not even notice the war that&#8217;s raging behind the scenes at this very minute. However, being the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rss" title="wikipedia - rss" target="_blank">RSS</a> junkie that I am, it&#8217;s painfully obvious. You see, on the web-side, it looks like Upcoming is doing a good job of keeping the site spam free. Unfortunately it appears their RSS pipe, which I use daily to find new events in San Francisco, is passing along each and every spam event that&#8217;s entered.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/greader-upcoming_spam.png" alt="Upcoming Spam" height="222" width="382" /></p>
<p><span id="more-31"></span> Previously you&#8217;d only see real spam once every month or so, with an occasional spammy (or was it just annoying?) event now and then. Today alone, there have been approximately 80 or so spam entries and the number is still climbing; and not just short items - but long ones that fill my Google Reader screen, and then some.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s obvious someone has figured out an automated system to post spam events to Upcoming. Or should I say, a spammer just turned his attention toward Upcoming, and realized it was an easy mark?</p>
<p>Or so I thought at first. I&#8217;ve been flagging events as spam whenever I could, since this started, but it finally got annoying enough that I sent the powers that be a terse message about getting a handle of this and maybe &#8220;using <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captcha" title="wikipedia - captcha" target="_blank">captcha</a> or something.&#8221; And what do you know&#8230;they do! You see, you don&#8217;t need to bother w/ captcha when entering a new event, but you do need to when creating a new account. Here&#8217;s a sample below:</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/upcoming-captcha.jpg" alt="Upcoming Captcha" /></p>
<p> It seems some crafty spammer has figured out how to automagically read this type of captcha? It was just a couple weeks ago that I saw an article asking &#8220;<a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001001.html" target="_blank">Has CAPTCHA Been Broken?</a>&#8221; It went on to talk about a Chinese hacker that had a complete pricelist of captchas that could be countered, but that Yahoo&#8217;s was currently unbreakable. Well&#8230;it appears things have changed.</p>
<p>Or perhaps they&#8217;re getting paid enough by their advertisers nowadays to hire an army full of people that know one English character from another. Either way, it&#8217;s obvious that the current state of human verification just isn&#8217;t good enough. Perhaps RSS spam filter services are just around the corner? Hrumpf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/12/04/upcoming-rss-choking-on-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Street View Sub-Contractor?</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/06/16/streetview-sub-contractor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/06/16/streetview-sub-contractor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 06:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sf]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google earth]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[street view]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/2007/06/16/streetview-sub-contractor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ .flickr-photo { border: solid 2px #000000; } .flickr-yourcomment { } .flickr-frame { text-align: left; padding: 3px; } .flickr-caption { font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px; } 
 	
Street View Sub-Contractor?, originally uploaded by chrisr.
 	Spotted this vehicle today on the way to Molly Stones. I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s for creating the pano photos for Google&#8217;s Street View, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css"> .flickr-photo { border: solid 2px #000000; } .flickr-yourcomment { } .flickr-frame { text-align: left; padding: 3px; } .flickr-caption { font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px; } </style>
<p class="flickr-frame"> 	<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisr/559061406/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1170/559061406_cf53ddb632.jpg" class="flickr-photo" /></a></p>
<p><span class="flickr-caption"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisr/559061406/">Street View Sub-Contractor?</a>, originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/chrisr/">chrisr</a>.</span></p>
<p class="flickr-yourcomment"> 	Spotted this vehicle today <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2fa74c" title="-&gt; google streetview" target="_blank">on the way</a> to <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2yr875" title="-&gt; google maps" target="_blank">Molly Stones</a>. I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s for creating the pano photos for Google&#8217;s <a href="http://maps.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=68476#street_views" title="steet view info" target="_blank">Street View</a>, but perhaps someone else is deploying something similar. <a href="http://earthmine.com" title="earthmine.com" target="_blank">Earthmine.com</a> has nothing beyond login and email links. The domain is registered to some dude in San Francisco at a company called SurfaceWise. <shrug><br />
</shrug></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/06/16/streetview-sub-contractor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on!</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/04/21/comment-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/04/21/comment-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 20:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[admin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/2007/04/21/comment-on/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;ve switched from super-paranoid mode to a lot less paranoid, but still in control mode for blog comments. So have it! Do your worst!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/images.thumbnail.jpeg" title="raise your hand" alt="raise your hand" align="right" height="120" width="88" />So I&#8217;ve switched from super-paranoid mode to a lot less paranoid, but still in control mode for blog comments. So have it! Do your worst!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/04/21/comment-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some decent signage, finally.</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/04/20/some-decent-signage-finally/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/04/20/some-decent-signage-finally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[scorn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sf]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[muni]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ .flickr-photo { border: solid 2px #000000; } .flickr-yourcomment { } .flickr-frame { text-align: left; padding: 3px; } .flickr-caption { font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px; } 
 	
Some decent signage, finally., originally uploaded by chrisr.
 	It looks like with the addition of the new (and now infamous) T Line, SFMTA has actually hired a graphic designer! [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<style type="text/css"> .flickr-photo { border: solid 2px #000000; } .flickr-yourcomment { } .flickr-frame { text-align: left; padding: 3px; } .flickr-caption { font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px; } </style>
<p class="flickr-frame"> 	<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisr/466422560/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/201/466422560_978156c4cf.jpg" class="flickr-photo" height="344" width="458" /></a></p>
<p><span class="flickr-caption"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisr/466422560/">Some decent signage, finally.</a>, originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/chrisr/">chrisr</a>.</span></p>
<p class="flickr-yourcomment"> 	It looks like with the addition of the new (and now infamous) T Line, SFMTA has actually hired a graphic designer! /boggle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/04/20/some-decent-signage-finally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WTFSPOILER??</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/04/19/wtfspoiler/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/04/19/wtfspoiler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[autos]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[scorn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[aerodynamics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/20070419wtfspoiler/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the $3.50-4.00/gallon world we live in today, one would think the last thing someone is concerned about is how much downforce they have keeping their rear wheels on the ground. Take this poor schmuck mentioned on Autoblog for instance. Never mind the fact that he definitely doesn&#8217;t have a need for this aerodynamic device, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/img_3680.jpg" title="spoiler" alt="spoiler" align="right" height="172" width="273" />In the $3.50-4.00/gallon world we live in today, one would think the last thing someone is concerned about is how much <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoiler_%28automotive%29" title="&gt; Wikipedia">downforce</a> they have keeping their rear wheels on the ground. Take this poor schmuck mentioned on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/19/aerodynamic-dyslexia/" title="&gt; Autoblog" target="_blank">Autoblog</a> for instance. Never mind the fact that he definitely doesn&#8217;t have a need for this aerodynamic device, but it&#8217;s painfully obvious that he has no idea how it&#8217;s supposed to work in the first place. Or perhaps he has <em>too much</em> downforce, and likes it a bit loose in the rear-end? Either way, I bet he&#8217;d prefer to save the 5-10MPG he&#8217;s dragging around behind him, just for show.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a radical idea: I bet 99% of the cars currently on our public roads with spoilers don&#8217;t need &#8216;em. Why not save yourself some gas money and leave the stupid thing at the dealership? You&#8217;re not impressing anyone anyway, Mario.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2007/04/19/wtfspoiler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
