<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>techscorn &#187; usb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techscorn.com/tag/usb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techscorn.com</link>
	<description>sometimes tech. sometimes scorn. sometimes both.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:31:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>USB 2.0 &#8211; Don&#039;t believe the hype!</title>
		<link>http://www.techscorn.com/2006/11/usb-20-dont-believe-the-hype/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techscorn.com/2006/11/usb-20-dont-believe-the-hype/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 21:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techscorn.com/20061109usb-20-dont-believe-the-hype/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since USB 2.0 hit the market, it's been touted as the next best thing to sliced bread. Or at least better then Firewire 400 (aka 1394a). As you may know, FW400 is 400 Mb/s and USB 2.0 is rated at 480 Mb/s, so you'd think USB 2.0 would be faster. But it's not. In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.techscorn.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/usb-96x150.png" alt="usb" id="image19" title="usb" align="right" />Ever since USB 2.0 hit the market, it's been touted as the next best thing to sliced bread. Or at least better then Firewire 400 (aka 1394a). As you may know, FW400 is 400 Mb/s and USB 2.0 is rated at 480 Mb/s, so you'd think USB 2.0 would be faster. But it's not. In all my experience with file transfers, it always comes up short, and Firewire is by far faster and more stable. I don't have any concrete reports in front of me backing this up - just experience and gut. Yet USB seems to be the belle of the ball for some reason. WTF??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techscorn.com/2006/11/usb-20-dont-believe-the-hype/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
